Measure how your brand appears in AI Search then improve the content and signals shaping those answers.

Every company will care about how AI talks about their brand.
Your buyers are already asking AI which companies to consider, how products compare, and what solution fits a specific problem. Those answers can shape the shortlist before someone reaches your website.
We help B2B companies measure what AI says about them, understand where competitors are more visible, and improve the content and signals behind those answers to increase visibility. We start with a focused baseline audit using around 25 questions that matter to your business.
The terminology is still settling. Answer Engine Optimisation, or AEO, and Generative Engine Optimisation, or GEO, often describe overlapping work. On this page, we use the plainer term "AI search optimisation".
The acronym matters less than the outcome. Your company should appear when buyers ask relevant questions, be described accurately, and be recommended for reasons you can support. The sources behind the answer matter too.
In a Webflow survey of more than 100 marketing leaders and 300 practitioners, 93% of leaders said AEO would be important to company success within two years. Only 25% of practitioners said they fully understood it. [cite:Webflow survey|https://webflow.com/blog/marketers-ai-adoption-wave|Webflow marketer survey, 2025. Shows strong AEO interest and a large understanding gap.]
That gap is where practical measurement helps.
The work has three main goals.
These are questions where your company should appear but does not. A competitor may be cited for a product category, use case, or buying criterion that your website already covers. The first job is to understand why the connection is missing and strengthen the relevant source material.
A mention is not always a win. The answer may describe your company inaccurately, associate it with the wrong category, or recommend a competitor because your proof is weak or hard to find. We look at the context of the mention as well as its frequency.
Some valuable questions have no consistent winner yet. They may concern an emerging problem, a niche use case, or a buying question the market has not answered well. These spaces can become strong content opportunities when they match a real business priority.
Yes. AI search is another discovery layer built partly on the same web that powers traditional search.
Google says the normal SEO fundamentals still apply to AI Overviews and AI Mode. Pages need to be crawlable and indexable. Their content needs to be useful and connected through clear internal structure. Google also states that no special AI markup is required for inclusion. [cite:Google Search Central|https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features|Google guidance, updated 2025. Existing SEO fundamentals remain relevant to AI features.]
The difference is in what we measure. A traditional rank tells you where one page appears for one query. AI answers can combine searches and sources. They can mention several brands, change their wording, and produce different results across platforms.
SEO remains the foundation, but no longer shows the whole visibility picture.
Before an ongoing engagement, we define around 25 prompts. They reflect your products and customer problems, along with the buying criteria and strategic priorities that matter most.
We run them across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. The three platforms do not retrieve and assemble information in the same way, so looking at them separately matters.
The audit shows data like:
We then walk through the findings with you. The goal is not to turn one score into a verdict. We establish a useful baseline, explain what the metrics mean, and decide whether the opportunity is worth pursuing.
The audit is free and does not require an ongoing agreement.
An ongoing programme expands the baseline into a controlled measurement and implementation loop.
We develop around 100 questions organised by strategic business theme. Available search data informs the set. So do customer language, sales questions, internal knowledge, market priorities, and your team's input.
The prompts cover different stages of the buying journey. We include problems and solutions, use cases, technical requirements, ROI, education, comparisons, and alternatives.
For a B2B fintech platform, one theme might cover digital client onboarding and another regulatory reporting. Portfolio operations and vendor comparison may need their own themes. This shows whether the brand is visible in one part of the business but absent in another.
The agreed prompt set runs across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity every day. With around 100 prompts and three platforms, that produces about 300 answer checks per day and 9,000 per month.
Repeated tracking matters because generated answers vary. A single screenshot can reveal a problem, but it cannot show a trend.
The dashboard shows overall visibility and performance by platform. You can also inspect competitor rankings, business themes, and individual prompts. Each month, we publish a report showing what moved, what stayed flat, what we completed, and what to prioritise next.
We typically work on a monthly retainer that combines ongoing monitoring and reporting with a fixed number of implementation hours. We use those hours to address the gaps we find, rather than handing over a report and leaving the client with a list of tasks.
The next reporting cycle shows whether the tracked answers reflect the work. Some changes work. Others do not. The loop lets us learn and adjust.
One AI answer is an anecdote. Repeated answers across a fixed prompt set become a useful signal.
We look at the headline numbers and the answers behind them.
The most important metrics are:
We break these metrics down by platform, business theme, prompt, and competitor. That makes the results more useful than one overall score. A company can be visible for its established product while almost absent from a new strategic category.
They are directional, not absolute.
Generated answers can change with the model, date, location, source index, and phrasing of the question. No single universal AI rank behaves like a traditional search position.
We control the prompt set, platforms, frequency, and reporting method. Daily tracking reduces the influence of one unusual answer and makes sustained movement easier to see.
We also keep the raw answer context. A rising visibility score means little if the answer describes the company inaccurately or for the wrong reason.
In our work, AI answers often respond much faster than traditional SEO rankings. We can sometimes see the first effect within days after AI systems pick up an updated page or source.
That speed is one reason daily tracking matters. One changed answer can be noise. When the same improvement appears across repeated runs and more than one platform, it starts to look like a real result.
Not every gap moves at the same speed. Clearer on-site content, corrected company information, and stronger proof can have a quick effect. Broader changes in authority, recommendation patterns, and third-party coverage still take longer.
We do not promise a fixed timeline, but the feedback loop moves much faster than traditional SEO work.
We start with the technical foundations and content systems on the website, then work outwards to the sources shaping AI answers.
and create text or Markdown versions of important pages so agents can access the core information without working through the full visual layer of the site.The client owns the subject matter and supplies the product knowledge. Its customer insight and strategic priorities guide the content. We identify the gaps and help structure the material, then implement it on the website.
The tracking tells us which of these areas deserves attention first. We make the changes, then measure how the answers respond.
We do not stop at monitoring or recommendations. We work proactively from the data and implement improvements directly on the website.
Because Oimachi works across positioning, content, website structure, Webflow development, and technical implementation, we can act on what the tracking reveals. That might mean rewriting a product page, creating missing comparison content, improving the CMS structure, adding proof, or correcting a technical issue.
Your team brings knowledge of your customers, sales conversations, and strategic priorities. We use that context to decide which questions to track and what to change. Then we make the changes and measure whether the answers improve.
We structure ongoing work as a monthly retainer based on how much optimisation capacity the company wants. We recommend a minimum of 15 hours per month. That gives us enough time to act on the findings instead of limiting the work to reporting.
Some companies start at that level. Others want to move faster and invest more.
Every ongoing engagement includes monitoring, access to the custom dashboard, and a monthly report. The main variable is the monthly number of hours available for content, technical, and off-site improvements.
You do not need a complete AI search strategy before you begin.
Start with the questions your customers ask. We will show you where your company appears, where competitors are ahead, and which gaps are worth acting on before you commit to ongoing work.